There’s Always One Employee Who Does Too Much

The other apartments had ordinary carpet lines. Then I opened one bedroom door and found a cleaner who had apparently decided the floor needed a composition. There’s always one employee who does too much. I met two yesterday: one at the Raising Cane’s drive-thru and one I now consider the Michelangelo of carpet.

I came to photograph an apartment. The carpet cleaner had left behind a body of work.

The Riff. September 25, 2026

I was photographing apartments when I walked into an empty bedroom and found that somebody had already made a picture on the carpet.

At least, that appeared to be the plan.

The carpet cleaner had made the usual straight lines along the walls. Very nice. Professional. Then, somewhere in the middle of the room, the lines changed direction and began forming shapes.

One looked like a chair. Another looked like the place where the chair had been asked to leave.

I stood in the doorway trying to figure out whether this was cleaning or a message.

There’s always one employee who does too much.

I encountered it twice yesterday. First at Raising Cane’s, where the greeting at the drive-thru box was, “Chickchickchick what can I help you wit’?”

You only serve chicken.

Later in the day, I met the Michelangelo of carpet.

You ask someone to clean the carpet, and they decide the carpet needs a closing number. Everybody else finishes their assigned rooms and goes home. This person sees an empty floor and thinks, Finally, a canvas.

I photographed the other apartments. Their carpets had the normal lines. Neat rows. Evidence that a machine had passed through and an employee had moved on with their day.

Then I opened this door.

Same building. Same kind of bedroom. One carpet cleaner with a vision.

I’ve photographed plenty of freshly cleaned places. Carpet lines usually tell you where the machine went. These told me where the machine had paused to consider its next move.

It’s like a baseball outfield, but different.

I can picture the cleaner stepping back to inspect the first pattern.

“Needs something in the foreground.”

Then another pass. A diagonal. A little shading near the outlet.

By the time I arrived, the room looked like somebody had tried to draw a living room using only changes in carpet nap.

As a photographer, I have to pay attention to details like this. A crooked lamp bothers me. A cord sticking out from behind a nightstand bothers me. An unexplained dark rectangle in the middle of an otherwise empty bedroom tends to hold my attention.

I moved to the other side of the room. The rectangle followed me.

Not physically. That would have been a different article.

I tried a wider shot. Now the whole composition was visible. The cleaner had used the full room. There was work along the baseboard and a bold decision in the center.

I considered asking the agent whether the carpet was supposed to look like that. But I didn’t know how to phrase it without sounding as though I’d discovered a crop circle indoors.

“Is this bedroom staging, or should I call someone?”

The trouble is, I respect the effort. That carpet had been thoroughly cleaned. I could see evidence of labor in every direction. The cleaner had gone beyond the job description and continued until the job developed a plot.

I’ve had days like that. You start adjusting one photo and suddenly it’s forty minutes later and you’re removing a tiny reflection from a faucet nobody will ever notice.

Maybe the cleaner noticed the machine made a satisfying curve. Maybe they wondered whether they could make another one. I understand how a person gets there.

I still had to photograph the room.

So I took a few angles, found the ones that made the carpet look most like carpet, and moved on to the next apartment. Its carpet was perfectly ordinary.

A little disappointing, if I’m honest.

This apartment will rent. Somebody will bring in a bed. Within a week, the entire installation will be hidden under furniture and three things they meant to unpack.

I’m glad I saw it first.

Most people finish their work and leave no trace.

This person signed the floor.


Don’t Pick What I Pick

Yesterday: 2–2. Arizona beat Colorado 12–8, which is a lot of runs for a game I chose partly because I liked the pitching matchup. The Falcons beat Green Bay 35–14 outright, so our +4.5 was never asked to do any work.

The Braves scored six and still lost 7–6 to Cincinnati. Boston lost 1–0 to Cleveland. The Red Sox supplied the zero, which is a difficult way to support my case for them.

ALL SPORTS: 1,091–1,108–7 · 17 net wins from .500.
TENNIS: 1–1

Today’s four:

  • Blue Jays ML vs. Reds. Toronto at home is my first choice.
  • Brewers ML vs. Cardinals. Milwaukee gets the full game. A one-run win counts.
  • White Sox ML vs. Rockies. No run-line assignment. Just win.
  • Dodgers ML at Giants. The price is steep, but I prefer this spot to asking the Padres to play after clinching and celebrating last night.

Lines can move before first pitch.

This isn’t called Pick What I Pick.

It’s called Don’t Pick What I Pick.

Please wager accordingly.

BUT WAIT There’s more